Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Soapbox

This is a rant:

I first became aware of my nemesis, the Amazing Girl, around the age of fifteen. Well, of one in particular: Anne Weinstock. An ethereal creature who wore scarves on her head and layers of shabby sweaters over her slender frame, Anne worked in clay, made vague, emotional statements of feeling in class, wept, and – perhaps her defining characteristic --referred to many, many things as "amazing."
Then there was her other defining characteristic. From the moment she transferred to our high school, boys worshipped her, and she moved from boyfriend to boyfriend with callousness obliviousness, cleaving to the next one with the same sensitive rapture that she'd shown the last.
Her appeal was, I could see, elemental. It was horribly depressing.
Once I started looking for them, I could see that Amazing Girls were everywhere.
Backpacking through South America, smoking hash with locals; reading Sylvia Plath in the park; earnestly worshipping Frida Kahlo in museums; dancing barefoot in the rain everywhere. While many are hippies, they are not all, by any means. They come in all nationalities, all shapes and sizes, from earth mother to ethereal. Some are insipid, others lively, some bisexual and others not, some vegan and some merely vegetarian.
But to them all there is a certain underlying sameness. All are vaguely creative, all sort of political, all sweet and kind and sympathetic and all lacking in any critical judgment whatsoever. Indeed, a lack of harsh judgment might be called the central tenet of their sisterhood, and perhaps a key to their particular magic.
To girls like me – sharp, mean, opinionated, decidedly lacking in mystery – they are a despair. Normal women cannot compete with Amazing Girls. We lack the mystique, the ready sympathy, the soul. They're twice as threatening as any bombshell, for they promise great depth. Supportive and uncritical in a way no one with any judgment can be, they also offer a famed flexibility towards traditional commitment, and the promise of utter sexual abandon. "Vice, Virtue. It's best not to be too moral." declares the definitive old Amazing Girl, Maude of Harold and fame – a favorite of every Amazing Girl. "You cheat yourself out of too much life. Aim above morality. If you apply that to life, then you're bound to live life fully." Indeed.
"Above all," wrote Joan Didion of Ur-Amazing Girl Joan Baez," she is the girl who "feels" things, who has hung onto the freshness and pain of adolescence, the girl ever wounded, ever young."
Sinclair Lewis captures it perfectly in Main Street’s description of the 1920s varietal: “Every cell of her body was alive – thin wrists, quince-blossom skin, black hair…a fragile child who must be cloaked with understanding kindness. “Psychic,” the girls whispered, and “spiritual.” Yet so radioactive were her nerves, so adventurous her trust in rather vaguely constructed sweetness and light. A girl on a hilltop…credulous, plastic, young; drinking the air as she longed to drink life. The eternal aching comedy of expectant youth!”
I began to keep lists of famous Amazing Girls: Joan Baez and Judy Collins, of course, but also Anais Nin, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Miranda July, Lady Ottoline Morrell, Edie Sedgwick, Caroline Blackwood,Vanessa Bell --to say nothing of Rima.( “So vivid was the image left on my brain that she still seemed to be actually before my eyes; and she was not there, nor had been, for she was a dream, an illusion, and no such being existed, or could exist, in this gross world: and at the same time I know that she had been there – that imagination was powerless to conjure up a form so exquisite.” )
Then one day, while staring at Vermeer's “Young Woman with a Water Pitcher” on an excursion to the Met, I had a horrible revelation: an amazing girl! And not just her, either! I thought of all the youthful poets and composers I knew, swooning after the vacant-eyed waifs who sat, chin on knees, gazing up at them at parties, nodding understandingly, breathing "amazing...” then leaping up to dance, abandoned, when someone's band started to play. Surely Raphael had been just as susceptible. The Mona Lisa, the Venus de Milo, the Nude Descending Staircase, the subject of every famous painting, poem, and piece of music -- they had all been Amazing Girls. I was as sure of it as I'd ever been of anything in my life -- Amazing Girls are and always have been the world's muses.
The career of an English major at a liberal arts college is littered with Amazing Girls in all their incarnations. Of course, college is their natural breeding ground. It is where they bloom and flourish, come into their own, staring up adoringly at professors and entrancing earnest young poets. They perform modern dances and read their original short stories. They hold forth in class, presuming emotion and feeling a more than worthy substitute for the harshness of fact.
It was infuriating to behold. The most attractive boys, otherwise rational creatures, worshipped them. Worse still, because Amazing Girls, by doing nothing but look sensitive, fit everyone’s idea of an artist, they were treated as such for doing nothing but sleeping with them! How had groupie-ism become such a talent?
“Primarily you belong to a special type, a special race of women,” D.H. Lawrence wrote to the mediocre muse, Ottoline Morrell. “Like Cassandra, and some of the great women saints. They were the great media of truth, of the deepest truth: through them…the truth came – as through a fissure from the depths and the burning darkness that lies out of the depth of time.”
“Like a wild and wise animal," rhapsodized Max Eastman of Isadora Duncan, “she fled from those who sought to capture the essence of her — which was motion — by making her stand still.”
Meanwhile, the promiscuous Edna St. Vincent Millay was, “a spokesman for the human spirit....with an intoxicating effect on people," according to Edmund Wilson, who further observed that this particular charm led many a man “to feel…he had found his mate.”
The world, women-wise, being divided into two camps, my friends – mostly of the wise-cracking girl-Friday school -- recognized the phenomenon immediately, and seized upon it with rage and excitement.
"The girls who hug all the time," said one friend eagerly.
"My yoga instructor," added another.
"Greg's new girlfriend," sighed a third sadly, referring to her ex-boyfriend, a struggling musician ripe for AG picking.
My male friends, of course, had no idea. To humor me, they’d pretend to despise them, and then likely as not show up a week later with Amazing Girls on their arms.
While the 1960s were a golden age for the Amazing Girl, it seems clear to me, after much consideration, that the 18th century provided one important model: the Romantics' ideal of the pure and naturally innocent woman, a creature morally inferior to men but capable of spiritual perfection -- in short, a childlike vessel for the projection of masculine ideals. Wordsworth’s Lucy, dying in romantic perfection; Byron’s muse walking in beauty, like the night –
“And on that cheek, and o'er that brow,

So soft, so calm, yet eloquent,

The smiles that win, the tints that glow,
15
But tell of days in goodness spent,

A mind at peace with all below,

A heart whose love is innocent!”

Goethe is a particular offender in this regard, draping the unremarkable Charlotte in laurels such that, “... - When I have been with her for two or three hours, entranced by her ways and the divine expressiveness of her words, and my senses gradually become excited, my sight grows dim.”
Of course, the poets of our own age are just as bad – from Bob Dylan’s vacant muses, wearing their sparkling Egyptian rings and breaking just like little girls, to the free spirits who masquerade as “ruby-throated sparrows” and go around dancing in the sand.
Mystery is the Amazing Girl’s musical hallmark. “She would never say where she came from …who can pin a name on you?” warble the entranced Rolling Stones.
“Who can know the thoughts of Mary Jane?” wonders Nick Drake.
Literature gives us Murakami’s mysteriously vanishing muses, empty vessel Griet of the pearl earring, and the particularly infuriating Theodore Roethke poem: “I knew a woman, lovely in her bones.”
Of course, they’re movie staples, Amazing Girls -- changing people’s lives, teaching the uptight to live, spreading sunshine. Penny Lane, Almost Famous’s luminous groupie; Natasha Wagner’s wide-eyed rock critic in High Fidelity, or Natalie Portman’s grotesquely adorable “Sam” in Garden State (“This song will change your life, I swear.”)
By the time the latter film made its appearance, Amazing Girls had become an obsession with me. I was not sure how, but I was certain the Amazing Girl was a very important cultural phenomenon. I talked about it endlessly. I discussed it in my thesis (title: “Amazing Girls: Or, on the frustrations of not being a muse.”) When asked to contribute a short story to a friend’s literary magazine, I discussed Joyce Carol Oates’s (admittedly speculative) hatred of Amazing Girls. (“ What she had termed ‘Amazing Girls’ had become something of an obsession with her. In her organized fashion, she had long since started a file on them. Oh, how she hated those blank-eyed children!”) The story was deemed autobiographical.
After a few years, there was some feeling that my interest had gotten out of hand. Fewer and fewer of my friends were willing to share in my indignation, to attend my film festivals, to discuss the Amazing Girl’s cultural significance in the Renaissance. I made a conscious effort to talk about it less, to avoid Young Woman with a Pitcher, to sit though Harold and Maude with a placid smile and keep my mouth shut when my brother showed up one Thanksgiving with Sascha, an ethereal vegan from San Francisco.
Then, not long ago, at the Whole Foods in Union Square, I ran into the original Amazing Girl, Anne Weinstock. She looked just the same – scarf on hair, several layers of ragged sweaters, a faraway look in her eye. She was, she told me vaguely, “an artist.” She was living with a sculptor. She pronounced the mediocre specifics of my own life “amazing” and hugged me before we parted.
Watching her walk away, I felt suffused with guilt. She was so nice, so sincere, so nonjudgmental! I had spent so many years resenting someone completely innocuous. I made a spontaneous resolve to change my ways – to approach my life with the openness and enthusiasm of an Amazing Girl. Then, as Anne’s slender frame disappeared down the Grains aisle, I saw several young men look after her yearningly. My heart hardened. I held a film festival that night.

49 comments:

Terri said...

Have you ever discovered the dark underbelly of this creature? It will frighten and shock you.

Michelle said...

OMG. I never realized it... I finally get it. I am an AG! Here's something to make you feel better - men have a habit of falling madly in love with me and then freaking. AGs intoxicate lovers, but we can't seem to keep them. They seem to disbelieve our reality and clam up, preventively.

I have had FIVE MEN fall madly in love with me, head over heels giddy, in the last eight months... only to freak out and back away when they realized that they couldn't maintain the connection. It takes a lot of energy (and balls) to dance on hilltops with AGs. You envy the burn rate, how fast we move from sexy, soulful artist to sexy, soulful artist, blah blah blah... I guess it's because anyone who's not an AG (are there AMs?) can't keep the "gates of experience" open indefinitely and bear what comes in. We are constantly disappointed. We are always hoping. And we refuse to become jaded. So, sure, the jaded envy that - but they by definition aren't ready to deal with the pain of each successive disappointment. Wah wah wah. Yeah. Anyway, it's a philosophical choice, we all make them.

Thanks for painting the picture so clearly. Sorry we bum you out. We bum ourselves out, too, sometimes.

Leti said...

Wow, you just articulated the teenage rage I felt when reading every Tom Robbins novel. At UC Santa Cruz we used to call AGs "scarfys".
Although I would argue that although Joan Didion is critical and has opinions she has AG tendencies (her love of greenhouses, descriptions of flowers, etc) to temper them, and the softening of her acerbic wit by her AG tendencies are what make her the favorite WOMAN writer of so many men.

Allison said...

I'm reading this on the heels of the Jezebel post on Manic Pixie Dream Girls, and suddenly realizing what infuriated me all those years. While I was swooning after the wanna-be poets and artists, they were chasing waify, big-eyed girls with philosophy minors. They certainly didn't want to discuss political economy with me. I had this idea that I could be the down-to-earth person who completed one of these soulful lads. But nope, they wanted the no-makeup, scarf-draped, granny boot girl who hung on their every word.

Captain said...

Thank you so much for this well researched essay. Upon encountering this type in fiction or reality (and those in reality are really part-fiction) I can now exchange my feelings of envy and despair for rage and disdain.

Michelle said...

It's way easier to live jaded and angry, you can't get hurt that way. Correction - you can pretend you aren't getting hurt that way. Yes, we AGs are soft on the boys - we're also soft on everyone else, too. We're soft and kind, and that's just as legitimate as being hard and bitchy. I'll say it again - "just as legitimate". No judgement implied. See how that works? Compassion - how AMAZING.

You all seem to assume that the surface you choose to/get to see is all that is there. Or you assume ugliness beneath it. Your world is your mirror, people.

Meghan said...

I have been pathetically trying to articulate this particular rage within me for years.

(Being best friends with an AG for 5 years of high school can do so much damage to the brassy ones like me.)

But yes, I have often subjected others to my confused ramblings about females muses in music. Remember "Meet Virginia?" Godamn.

Jennifer said...

I don't think anyone is dissing what's beneath the AG's surface. They're dissing the surface, because it's so perfectly calculated to get attention.

Of course it's nice to have a sunny and unjaded disposition that is all about art and soulfulness, but it is the calculated Anthropologie-catalog styling of that disposition that makes AGs so irresistible to men and so maddening to non-AG women. One can be sweet and unjaded without the styling, but without the styling it just comes across as frumpy/cheesy and isn't intoxicating or seductive. (Think Ann on Arrested Development.)

Michelle said...

@Jennifer - That's a really well-put response. And I have to admit that I am probably not a true AG, in that I am tall, strong, opinionated and wear makeup (sometimes lots of it!). I was even blonde for a time - I understand they are required to be brunettes? ;>

I can certainly agree that the pose of enlightenment is profoundly irritating (as is ANY pose for the pose's sake, and that one adds sanctimony to its offense)... but I give any human props for trying, however they can muster it. Perhaps sunny unjaded disposition compels me to give more credit than is due.

Thanks for not being a knee-jerk hater.

sdelezen said...

Being a pale wisp of a girl myself, I have been confused for an AG by more than a few gents looking for a muse, but they are quickly dissapointed when they realize that am strongly opinionated.

I've known an AG since college (and yes she does wear scarfs), and you have so perfectly articulated why I have decided I need to distance myself from her.

What the AG's love above all else is to be adored, which explains why they move from infatuation to infatuation. Despite all of their openness, they always hold themselves somewhat aloof, never revealing too much about themselves for fear of not being perceived as a perfect other-worldly being.

Adam said...

As a dude who resembles, or used to resemble, the "wandering soulster" you mention, I must confess I've fallen more than once head over heels for these AG's--scarves and all. Damn it's good to have someone listen to your crap for that long. That nonthreatening-but-magical presence tells you she's a prize to be won but she'll still make you feel like a stud. Invariably, though, it wasn't enough. I felt guilty, like I knew I ought to be with someone with more opinions, more baggage, more real inspiration. After all, a "muse" may help you write a few songs, but only a girl who can and does kick your ass from time to time is going to be one you want to keep around for good--at least for me. That's my girl now, and she blows the other girls out of the water.

I read the Jezebel post too (awesome). And there's one thing I'll say in defense of the AG's: Some non-AG's like to ascribe a deviousness/cattiness to these girls that just isn't there. They do really find all that stuff "amazing." That unassuming/nice way of being isn't just a tool to dupe young artists. It's nice to be around.

Clong Way From Home said...

Sadie, thanks for this piece. Really beautifully reasoned and written.

@ meghan--Meet Virginia! The WORST!

@ jennifer-- totally agree about the calculation being the most offending aspect of the AG. Nicely put.

I know plenty of genuinely weird people, but mostly even if they DO know how weird they are (most do not, which is what makes them charming), they don't capitalize on it/exaggerate it. That would be embarrassing.

I do have to admit bias, though. Being the stereotypical angry girl--it's really hard to compete with the AG!

Adam said...

I forgot to say in my comment: Really, really great essay.

Mahotma in Herre said...

I hate amazing girls too. I also hate the guys who like them. There's a similar antipathy toward the "inspired, care-free souls with no self-consciousness," also known as the Man of Action, from Notes From Underground, in the male community.

I say we build a coalition of losers, male and female, who unite against Amazing Girls and Men of Action, a coalition of underground(wo)men who refuse to envy wiry vegans from Minneapolis who quote Foucoult and bearded French dudes with "an apartment in the city" who direct music videos on occasion.

Eh, who am I kidding. The cause is lost. Everyone's always going to fall for the Amazing girl. Especially dudes who are white. Or named Common.

Steven said...

I think you might have had a muse yourself.

http://www.avclub.com/content/feature/wild_things_16_films_featuring

Jan said...

I think what men ultimately find so appealing in an AG is the prospect of a disciple, someone who will worship them in turn for their (usually mediocre) talents and epiphanies. And a true AG is satisfied in fulfilling the role of worshipper, content to make her own accomplishments mere second-rate tributes.

While it's easy to envy someone so seemingly carefree and effortless, at the end of the day I'm happy to be in a relationship where I'm an equal and not just a new-age, hippie housewife.

Jessica McLeod said...

This is a fantastic essay.

Harq al-Ada said...

This essay has a lot of insight into a certain type, but implies a false dichotomy that is pretty insulting to women. Are shallow and sweet or authentic and bitter young women's only choices? They are the only ones presented here.

TWOS said...

I would posit that the phenomenon you describe so well actually occurs with many breeds of Amazing Girls. The loving, scarf-wearing, wide-eyed ones may be scooping up all the artists and smoke-filled, coffee-shop poets. Throughout life I've seen these types, and it rarely bothered me since they were usually operating in a parallel market of competing for affections.

Yet there is at least one other breed of Amazing Girl (and, for the sake of argument, I suppose there's at least one for each subculture of traits and personalities): it's the amazingly brilliant, gorgeous-without-trying, worldly sophisticate who appears to effortlessly be the best at everything, and who is strong and opinionated, but somehow does it in such a nice, approachable way that both men and women find themselves helpless, feeling inferior to that mysterious greatness, and compelled to try and be near it beyond reason.

Same phenomenon, different traits. Some are chaste, some are wildly adventurous, some kind, some sharp-tongued. But for any breed of an Amazing Girl--damnable, unstoppable jealousy aside--I can ultimately only find fault with those who are irresponsible with the affections of those who chase after them. At the end of the day, though, it's the _mystery_ that sustains the aura of the Amazing Girl. Once you really, really get to know them, they can still be amazing, but they're no longer Amazing.

april said...

Thank you for articulating what's been troubling me for years now. My first encounter with an AG was not in film or fiction (that I know of), but a girl I met in college... a girl that I believed changed my life. Her AG-hood was astounding to me and I knew exactly why: because she made everyone feel good about themselves when she was around. So naturally, men fell for her, though she wasn't "hot". And then I, sadly, tried to make myself into an AG. And when it failed... when I returned to being a girl-friday, I felt like *I* had failed.... that I really was this miserable woman that men wouldn't naturally pine for. But that was who I was the whole time. And I'm glad for it. Because now I don't have such a facade of being so fucking interested in everyone's g-damn banality.

Yvonne said...

i am skinny and wear scarves, but i'm not an Amazing Girl... it's a real bummer.

Chet said...

How is this not exactly the same as the Nice Guys who complain about intelligent girls only wanting to date assholes?

The Amazing Girl has a shtick that is more attractive to the men you want to date than anything you're doing. There's nothing unfair about it. The intelligent response is to either act differently, or seek out different men.

Complaining about it is just entitled whining. None of your poet guys have to date you, remember?

Joy said...

It seems like you are talking about several different things here:

Girls who pretend to be artsy and creative to get attention from men--which is irksome, for sure.

Girls who have talent but who express it girlishly, ie. Joan Biaz or Edna St Vincent Millay.

Girls who are muses, who we rarely know enough of to judge (after all, the Mona Lisa couldn't really have Da Vinci's job back in the 16th century, now could she?).

So I'm not really sure what an Amazing Girl is, but whoever she is, you sound jealous of her.

Sloophomey said...

I like to butt-bang Amazing Girls.

pizza! said...

I think you've tapped into the core of the matter here. AG's main characteristic and "virtue" is her eternal sense of awe to her loved one's work. You see, I could be perceived as and AG myself. Im a mediocre graphic designer, Im petite, long flowing hair and I wear scarfs in the middle of the summer. So why havent I be able to snatch any of the oh so handsome aspiring artists? Because Im very critic and lack all kind of gentleness and diplomatic skills. They'd show me their new sculpture and my comments would be many variations of "its a piece of crap". The oh so handsome aspiring artist would be disappointed in my lack of support and walk away.

An AG NEVER does that. She is a muse because she has an uncompromising devotion to her artist (or to all artists in general, explaining why she's so popular in such circles). She'll never give you a suggestion, criticism or an honest opinion. She's loved because she tells you exactly what you want to hear. And because she's just so darn pretty.

Poloppo said...

Hold on here! Some of the "amazing girls" did more than just look good or inspire men to their potential.

Isadora Duncan was a great artist who created modern dance as we know it today. She made her own fortune as a dancer, often refusing high paying gigs if she didn't feel as though enough respect would be paid to her art. She supported her entire family with her self-made fortune. She also stood up for the sexual and reproductive rights of women. She openly had two babies out of wedlock at a time when most women would have been thrown to the wolves, and never apologized. She practiced free love far past an age when most people thought of her as young or beautiful.

Miranda July is a talented film maker and artist. You don't see her hanging on an arm, you see her encourging children to make art, publishing her own fiction, writing and producing films.

Don't resent women who are cool and smart and talented and career oriented and possibly even also beautiful. We've all been upstaged by one of these, probably because they posess the same qualities all of us are looking for in a mate of any sex.

You have a valid point about the modern sensitive guy's muse who is devoid of an inner life. This architype does exist in the media. However, I think that you're just as guilty of reducing the real women you mentioned down to groupies.

Jenny said...

For me, the defining characteristic of an AG is that she really does not like other women very much. Remember Kate Hudson's character in "Almost Famous"; at one point she pretends to wave at a bunch of girls running track along side the bus, and then flips them the bird -- and then at another point she gives the stare of death at another groupie trying to enter her conversational group. The AG HAS to be the center of MEN's attention, and cannot really handle comfortably being around other women, especially any who might take the men's attention of of her.

Odelette said...

Harq al-Ada said, "Are shallow and sweet or authentic and bitter young women's only choices?" Um, yeah, kind of. Because authentic young women see what's going on in the world, especially as it relates to being a young woman in the world, and it's ugly, and that makes them bitter. See the book Reviving Ophelia--the author, a counselor of young women, said it's the smart and perceptive girls who start cutting themselves and attempting suicide and all. I think AGs find a way to go around all that difficult reality.

Tessa said...

wow this post made me feel great. In college (art school... yeah.) I was filled with that hopeless envy when the cute boys wearing their moth-eaten sweaters and victorian boots would come in with a drawing of a waif of a girlfriend, usually languishing in rumpled sheets smoking a cigarette, and wish so much to be her. Any boy I did snag usually was still somewhat aching from the loss of vanessa or stella or caitlyn, all about 5'1", 97 lbs, pixie cuts, abstract photographers who sewed their own clothes. I was loud, tall, often drunk, and worked in the woodshop. Now that I'm in the professional world, I've come to realize that deep, interesting, hot guys who's jeans I can actually fit into think its hot when a girl can use a table saw or pound pbrs or yell at people on the street. So go us. Pretty sure guys in bands totally wanna fuck angry, loud girls, too. AND have breakfast the next morning while talking about art. Loudly.

DL said...

I read this article feeling the same sort of irk I have whenever people say something like "real women have curves" or talk about "skinny bitches".

I'm an AG. No, I don't wear scarves...but I have. And I'm short, thin, have long hair, and like walking on the beach while it's raining. And as an "AG" I'd like to say that just because a woman can be diplomatic and kind and sensitive does not make her less of a women, less intelligent, or have some sort of inability to judge.

A woman's large, childish eyes does not mean they are vacuous or empty. Or even calculated to be so.

I'm not saying there aren't your ideas of the AG out there, I've seen them, too. But you seem to get your hackles raised against the 'false AG'. Someone who is shallow, play-acting, ersatz.

Maybe there should be two catagories. There are real AG's out there, and they truly just wish to be considered equally a woman to those who are bold as brass and curvalicious (though how boldness isn't an AG quality I'm not sure...it takes boldness to be different too does it not?)

They want to be your friend too.

marie said...

right. as many people have said, there is a great variety of amazing girls. there are those who truly are amazing, intelligent, free spirited, open and caring - like you, apparently, dl. there is the kind with no real ambition or critical bone in their bird-like body - (the true amazing girl) the author's anne. and there is the false amazing girl, or play-acting amazing girl, a stereotype with a dark, cruel underbelly. she is the kind of girl many high schoolers pretend to be.

adoration of women like this can be fetishistic. a lot of asian women are set up against this stereotype. what do you do when you are frail and beautiful? use it to your advantage? take the special treatment you receive and reflect it back to the world, in the process shining more beatific light on yourself? reject it by dyeing your hair purple and swearing a lot? it's all about realizing the effect you have on other people and choosing your own adventure. amazing girls with integrity will understand they receive special treatment and accept it with grace, not pretend they deserve it.

to recap: the infuriating thing about a true amazing girl is that she believes if everyone was as kind and open as she, they would get the same smiles and helpful hands. if i slip and fall, i have to get my own ass out of the dirt. just know that.

Krista said...

my boyfriend "thought" he was in love with his best friend. this was before i even knew him, but he has lied to me about her (naturally i am suspicious, since he's lied about her and she's an amazing girl). i met her last summer. she is so freaking positive and loves to talk and is so happy and so nice and does non profit work for a living (thanks to her trust fund). but the kicker came at the end of the night. when my boyfriend and i left this wedding shower (that i wasn't invited to, but i didn't know that, my boyfriend wanted me to come, but all of the girls made sure i was aware of the fact that i wasn't invited) she HUGGED ME GOODBYE. i don't hug people. it's awkward. amazing girls do.

fantastic blog post, thank you so much for putting my thoughts together for me better than i ever could. i didn't know why i hated these nice cool girls. i didn't realize they were all alike. until i read this. thanks, and i love what you're doing over at jezebel, keep up the good work!

Mike Pfeiffer said...

Linked here by The Onion.
This is a gorgeous essay, I love the quotes and examples you chose. Like every hopeful ar-teest kicking around the quad with hunched shoulders and a cardigan wrapped around his lanky, faux-weary frame- I've fallen for more than one Amazing Girl. They're an uncurable, pixie-haired disease! I just can't believe that I didn't notice this trend before...

timoni said...

I'm not an AM--in fact, I'm pretty much the opposite--but I know the type well. I think the concept of Amazing Girls is interesting for a lot of reasons, particularly because I've noticed many men come to relationships expecting to be inspired and (and even improved!) by the women they're dating. I have no such expectations of my boyfriends, of course. Kind of the opposite: I feel a general pressure to better myself when I'm single, and feel an overwhelming obligation to make sure I'm in emotional tip-top shape should I stumble across my future life partner (see Salon's "Looking for the perfect stranger" for an example of what I mean: http://www.salon.com/mwt/excerpt/2008/08/12/marrying_anita/index1.html).

An earlier commenter asked if there were any AMs. I've certainly never met one. To be honest, I'm not sure what I'd do with him if I found one.

Sedgwick Coleus said...

The "Amazing Girl" sounds a lot like the "Ingénue" character. Granted, one cannot be an ingenue forever, but one may still maintain such a facade. Do you want to be around people who give off positive energy, or be around people who give off negative energy?

elly j said...

"i didn't know why i hated these nice cool girls. i didn't realize they were all alike. until i read this."

i'm SO glad that ye olde petite sophisticate has given you all a way to galvanize your indirect and pointless hatred and fear of other women. i don't even know what archetype she is describing, or if any women of this archetype even actually exist in any world beyond that of her own fear.

i don't understand who the actual human being is behind this vague "AG" generalization that seems setup to contain almost any educated western white woman, and yet at the same time contains no actual woman at all. it seems like the women in the comments are using the description of an AG as a jumping off point for "any woman i felt was cooler than me" or "any woman whose apparent ease of being in the world made me feel insecure." i'm not sure where this collective display of total insecurity and stereotyping gets us, ladies. it is ugly to read and sad to think about.

you all seem to feel something has been taken or kept from from you by a woman fitting this description - i guess what i'm wondering is whether anyone else, woman, man, amazing or not, can keep any of you from having or being what you want? i'm not sure why it is the responsibility of the mystical conceptual "AG" that you are not like her.

pl said...

God this was a pathetic discussion of a sad generalization. Reading people talking about "Amazing Girls" and even some people calling themselves "Amazing Girls" made me throw up in my mouth a little. Get over yourselves.

This rant was ripe with envy, jealousy, and bitterness of the ripest kind. But I have to say I have never read someone create such a complex rationale for their insecurity before, oh wait, yes I have, every time I read someone creating a new sub genre of personality they seethe with envy towards. So, stand up the straw man and then take turns kicking and tearing at it- I hope it helps, but I also know it won't.

How would this read if we used the male equivalents for this discussion: Artsy Nice Guys vs Arrogant Dicks. After all we all hate Artsy Nice Guys, the way the girls fawn over them- arrrg I bet it just boils the blood of those Arrogant Dicks.

Get a grip, people are not one dimensional, "AGs" as you call them are no more a single social role, than all those who dislike them are one social role comprising of charmless bores with inferiority complexes.

me said...

I have theory. 'Amazing girls' are merely the equivalent of the annoying 'Ladies man', their names attest to their adoration by the opposite sex. 'Ladies men' have now been proven to be superficial and more importantly, one can with enough dedication learn to become a sort of 'Ladies man'.

The difference is that whereas 'Ladies men' make a killing, they are not idolized to a great degree by women in the manner that 'Amazing girls' are by men. The reason for this is since we live in patriarchial societies the concepts and symbols we use are masculine and the feminine is hidden, obcured and feared. Hence women are unaware that one can learn to become an 'Amazing girl' too, its manifestation is merely instinctual and unconcious. (And so almost impossible to articulate into words) Since men live in a feminine desert philosophically 'Amazing girls' are that much more 'amazing' in being the only flower. While a 'Ladies man' is a rose in a flower shop, women are attracted to this hyper masculine performance, usually only in the sexual/romantic sense and not in the much greater symbolic, conceptual and sexual sense of attraction an 'Amazing girl' is by men.

One of the things I like about 'Amazing girls' and 'Ladies men' is that it is such a great example of real intelligence, to instinctively assume the persona that is adored subconciously by the opposite sex. Adoration is what people do to idols, hence an 'Amazing girl' is limited or limiting herself if she chooses to remain just that. I talk myself out of 'Amazing girl' infatuations or reality says 'hi', either way you learn things when in the presence of the hyper feminine.

Ps (I use male and female terms loosely)

me said...

I have theory. 'Amazing girls' are merely the equivalent of the annoying 'Ladies man', their names attest to their adoration by the opposite sex. 'Ladies men' have now been proven to be superficial and more importantly, one can with enough dedication learn to become a sort of 'Ladies man'.

The difference is that whereas 'Ladies men' make a killing, they are not idolized to a great degree by women in the manner that 'Amazing girls' are by men. The reason for this is since we live in patriarchial societies the concepts and symbols we use are masculine and the feminine is hidden, obcured and feared. Hence women are unaware that one can learn to become an 'Amazing girl' too, its manifestation is merely instinctual and unconcious. (And so almost impossible to articulate into words) Since men live in a feminine desert philosophically 'Amazing girls' are that much more 'amazing' in being the only flower. While a 'Ladies man' is a rose in a flower shop, women are attracted to this hyper masculine performance, usually only in the sexual/romantic sense and not in the much greater symbolic, conceptual and sexual sense of attraction an 'Amazing girl' is by men.

One of the things I like about 'Amazing girls' and 'Ladies men' is that it is such a great example of real intelligence, to instinctively assume the persona that is adored subconciously by the opposite sex. Adoration is what people do to idols, hence an 'Amazing girl' is limited or limiting herself if she chooses to remain just that. I talk myself out of 'Amazing girl' infatuations or reality says 'hi', either way you learn things when in the presence of the hyper feminine.

Ps (I use male and female terms loosely)

me said...

I have theory. 'Amazing girls' are merely the equivalent of the annoying 'Ladies man', their names attest to their adoration by the opposite sex. 'Ladies men' have now been proven to be superficial and more importantly, one can with enough dedication learn to become a sort of 'Ladies man'.

The difference is that whereas 'Ladies men' make a killing, they are not idolized to a great degree by women in the manner that 'Amazing girls' are by men. The reason for this is since we live in patriarchial societies the concepts and symbols we use are masculine and the feminine is hidden, obcured and feared. Hence women are unaware that one can learn to become an 'Amazing girl' too, its manifestation is merely instinctual and unconcious. (And so almost impossible to articulate into words) Since men live in a feminine desert philosophically 'Amazing girls' are that much more 'amazing' in being the only flower. While a 'Ladies man' is a rose in a flower shop, women are attracted to this hyper masculine performance, usually only in the sexual/romantic sense and not in the much greater symbolic, conceptual and sexual sense of attraction an 'Amazing girl' is by men.

One of the things I like about 'Amazing girls' and 'Ladies men' is that it is such a great example of real intelligence, to instinctively assume the persona that is adored subconciously by the opposite sex. Adoration is what people do to idols, hence an 'Amazing girl' is limited or limiting herself if she chooses to remain just that. I talk myself out of 'Amazing girl' infatuations or reality says 'hi', either way you learn things when in the presence of the hyper feminine.

Ps (I use male and female terms loosely)

Cornelius Anatole said...

I (almost) hate to say it - but this post is .... amazing. Fortunately throughout my life "amazing girls" have never deigned to give me the time of day - so I have been forced to have relationships with real (as opposed to "amazing") girls. I cannot claim any credit for this, though - like I said it has just been my good luck.

Angelika HausFrauSki said...

I think Elly J put it best. Why must women constantly compete with one another and blame one another for our own insecurities and perceived failings? Why not focus on your own strengths and gifts instead of harping on and hating the strengths and gifts of other women?

The most attractive quality in people, men or women, is confidence, and confidence isn't something you get by berating other people. It's something you get from loving yourself, and I feel that if you loved yourself more, you wouldn't feel this loathing so vehemently. In fact, you probably wouldn't feel it at all. If you learned to celebrate your own beauty, you would find it easier to celebrate the beauty in others, too, thus becoming the elusive non-judgmental radiant woman you seem to so determined to hate.

Stop the insanity, ladies. Love yourselves. If you can't love yourself, how can you expect anyone else to love you?

JennyDevilDoll said...

This "Amazing Girl" or "Manic Pixie Dream Girl" or whatever you want to call it---I'm frustrated by the boys and now it seems the girls---who won't let her be human.

Yes, I am a petite big-eyed artist/musician with a (brunette of course) pixie haircut. I dress unconventionally, like obscure bands, and want to hang out with other artists. Now before you tell me to "get over myself" I'm just throwing this all out there to point out that yes, it stands to reason that I've encountered the type of man that fetishizes this sort of thing.

Except that's the problem--it's a fetish for them. I keep thinking "Wow, this guy accepts the way I am, even though people think I'm weird" only to find they get upset when I have my own problems and can't solely fixate on theirs, or they get professional jealousy because I'm doing art and music of my own, or to be blunt, the mental illness goes from being "wild" and "unpredictable" to "scary" and "disturbing." Yeah I'm the unconventional girl in love with art and underground films and performances, but I'm also the angry girl with the political opinions and medications and arm full of self-inflicted scars.

The first comment to this post mentioned the "dark underbelly of such a creature". Maybe I've just addressed my dark underbelly. Maybe I'm not really an AG but only appear to be one at first glance. Either way I wish both sexes would stop holding potential partners up to some myth.

Call me Fait said...

hm..

it is a bit late, to post a comment. i must admit though, your article made me feel not so great about myself. i always wondered just realized why it seemed many girls hold my deep value of earnestness in disdain. i think it's partially because they're trying to understand me through this type of character generalization... when i am much more complex than that... i suppose i will have to be more conscious of this when interacting with girls...

other than that i love your characterization of this wonderful woman. i am very much drawn to these earnest girls as friends, but my "amazing girl" may probably like you. girls who can burp with the guys, are funny and outspoken, and can make people laugh without them saying "how cute". also hate how people say i look very young, or make them feel like first time ___ or young again, or whatnot. i'm just living the only way i know how, and trying to cope with having lost innocence at too young of an age.

I think the worship of the amazing girl is an offshoot of the desperation of the super self conscious post modern urbanite. i think it's difficult for the modern person to live in the moment- mindful, yet not destructively self conscious.

well, i don't understand what is wrong with Amazing girls being interested in art, even if the art is "crap". i know that art has certain standards, but some people partake in artistic expression to try to express what they cannot through everyday conversation or writing.

thank goodness, though, i do not see myself fulfilling this Amazing Girl character type. i do not think my looks "cut it" (just like how the "hippie surfer dude" is almost always blonde) - i am not white and i do not have large doe eyes. i also have too much baggage, too. which comes in handy for once. it's good to know how some people may view me, and how i am most likely nothing like their expectations of me.

Liz said...

I'm a variation of an AG (reformed now, thank god), and you guys are way over-thinking this. We work to be "amazing" and sweet and non-judgmental and enthusiastic and really really happy about everything because we are expected to. That's what women are.

Personally, I got tired of all the guys who adored my "essence," but then seemed so bored. Or worse, freaked out if I ever actually had a real need.

It's not fun. We're as much the product of cultural expectations gone haywire as anorexics. Your real beef is with the guys who think vague goodness is all they want in a woman. I bet it does suck to see the guys stumble all over themselves to stand next to someone who will never, ever criticize. But trust me, it also sucks to realize that you are valued most the non-threatening irrelevance of your pinions. Instead of contributing to even more girl-on-girl hate, maybe try to save some anger for the society that expects this bs from women.

Nicola said...

This was so great. The first Amazing Girl I knew was influenced heavily in fifth or sixth grade by "Stargirl" and by 7th grade the teachers were having a conference on HOW TO GET HER TO WEAR SHOES IN SCHOOL. God, so annoying and, yes, the boys loved her.

courtney said...

I know it's been a long time since this was written, but I feel compelled to throw in my two cents. I'm not sure there are any real Amazing Girls. The vitriol in this article is pointed in the wrong direction.
As a very petite, weird woman who prefers her hair in a pixie cut for convenience, I have had many men fall for me based on a shallow perception of nonthreatening sweetness and overt sexuality. Someone else also pointed out the fetishizing of these traits, which I agree with more than women hating weird girls for some dumb false perception. It's a role put upon us by men, not one we choose or actually embody.
I can be just as bitchy (I use this phrase as a positive) as the "girl-friday". The men that are attracted to "Amazing Girls" or "Manic Pixie Dream Girls" tend to run away when they find this out. Don't blame the women for boys that can't handle a girlfriend with a brain.

Anonymous said...

I think Liz's comment gave a good perspective on the AG phenomenon, BUT, all the people that say "I am AG, but..." really AREN'T. There actually are women that fit the AG bill described in the essay 100%, and if you don't, you're not, so try not to be offended.

And if you think the writer of the essay and anti-AG league are jealous, does that mean it's a problem? Jealousy is a human emotion and there's nothing wrong with it. However, I think the AG thing goes further b/c they seem to a lot of women to be utterly false. For instance, if a guy you like chooses a smart, intelligent, kind woman over you, that's one thing, and might produce jealousy, but is more acceptable. An AG seems entirely without substance, and may actually be, or is pretending to be.

I don't think anyone can be jealous OF an AG, b/c at the end of the day, who would want to put themselves and their feelings and ambitions behind some man's? To be in a relationship only to inspire and support, and have to spend so much energy being quirky and a free spirit? Rather, I think non-AGs are jealous of the attention and results AGs get, because they don't seem to deserve it.

(Not that AGs are unintelligent, but the complete lack of critical thought and loving everything, and everyone, and referring to it ALL as "amazing" seems to point that way.)

Anonymous said...

Hello !.
You may , perhaps very interested to know how one can reach 2000 per day of income .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may commense to receive yields with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The company represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with affiliates everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your chance That`s what you really need!

I feel good, I began to get income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to select a correct companion utilizes your funds in a right way - that`s it!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!
It`s easy to start , just click this link http://anyfiqac.kogaryu.com/zahewi.html
and go! Let`s take this option together to feel the smell of real money